Consider one or more of the following questions to reflect on at the end of Subtopic 5.4. Discuss with another student or in a small group, or record (written, audio, video) your response.
The Earth4All model shows that the five transformations are deeply connected. Choose any two of the five and explain how progress in one could support progress in the other.
Section 5.4.1 argues that most people already support the kinds of changes described in The Giant Leap scenario. If public support is already there, why do you think these changes are so slow to happen? What does this tell you about how economic systems work?
Poverty and economic inequality are both described as system failures rather than personal failures. What is the difference between these two explanations, and why does it matter for how we respond?
Section 5.4.3 distinguishes between redistribution and predistribution as strategies for reducing economic inequality. Which approach do you think gets at the deeper roots of the problem? Could both be needed?
The universal basic dividend appears in three different sections of this subtopic, as a response to poverty, economic inequality, and gender inequality. Why do you think this single policy keeps appearing as a solution to such different problems?
Section 5.4.6 argues that improving energy efficiency is not enough if the goal of the economy remains endless growth, because of Jevons' paradox. Thinking about the Doughnut Economics model, what goal do you think should replace economic growth, and how would that change the way states approach the energy transformation?
Section 5.4.6 argues that the energy transformation cannot succeed if the goal of the economy remains endless economic growth. To what extent do you think degrowth (Section 5.3.4), a planned reduction in production and consumption, is essential to achieving all five of the Earth4All transformations? Are any of the five transformations possible without it, or does each one ultimately require a shift away from growth as an economic goal?
Referring to specific elements of the social foundation and the ecological ceiling in the Doughnut Economics model (Section 1.3.4), explain how the five transformations of The Giant Leap scenario could help move societies into the 'safe and just space for humanity'.
Figure 1. The Doughnut Economics model showing the 'safe and just space for humanity' where human needs are met within planetary boundaries
(Credit: Raworth (2025), CC-BY-SA 4.0)
Option: Systems diagrams of Too Little, Too Late and The Giant Leap
Note: To complete this activity, students should have covered Section S.5 on causal loop diagrams and feedback.
Time: 45–60 minutes Type: Pairs or small groups
The Earth4All model is built on the idea that the economy is a system of interconnected variables. When one variable changes, it sets off a chain of effects across the whole system. This activity asks you to map those connections yourself.
Below are ten variables drawn from the Earth4All model. Each one appears in Subtopic 5.4.
Level of poverty
Economic inequality
Gender empowerment
Food security
Clean energy access
State investment in public services
Trust in state institutions
Social cohesion
Ecological health
Carbon emissions
Step 1: Place the ten variables around a large circle on paper or a digital tool. You do not need to connect all of them. Start by identifying the three or four variables you think are most central to each scenario and work outward from there.
Step 2: Draw arrows between variables that influence one another. For each arrow, note:
the direction of influence (which variable affects which)
whether the relationship is direct (+) or inverse (–): does an increase in one variable increase or decrease the other?
Step 3: Identify at least one reinforcing feedback loop for each scenario:
Too Little, Too Late: How do poverty, inequality, and weak public systems reinforce decline? Trace a loop that shows how one problem makes others worse.
The Giant Leap: How do investments in public services, empowerment, and sustainability reinforce improvement? Trace a loop that shows how one positive change supports others.
Step 4: Compare your diagrams with another pair or group. Did you identify the same central variables? Did you draw the same relationships? Discuss any differences.
Reflection question: Looking at your completed diagram, where do you think the highest-leverage entry points are for change? Which variable, if shifted, would have the greatest effect on the rest of the system?